Artscience experience and replenishing the spirit
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84ec6/84ec64d221ec7f3b90cf74e1d066a1f39e79d891" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5e04/d5e0462ab5387082d6ec4898bbaccdd92565d72f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e49e/8e49ed1b33635bf57676de1d6f8bb0f0d1f0cc56" alt=""
In contemplating how far quantum physics have traveled since its early days, and the accomplishment that has been made, the physicists who were at the conference admitted to starting conditions that were far from promising, and the way forward remains as fuzzy as ever, with potential for friction even after years of accolades, accomplishments, and seeming successes that accompany those who had been in the field. While some of the physicists are open to asking the tough questions of the constitution of nature, others would prefer to go with questions that could lead to a more definite way forward (even if it means skipping over ontological big questions), with future technological impetus. But one of the things I've learned is that, quantum physics was never developed with any operationalisation possibilities in mind - that it suddenly became the anthem of the scientific epistemology of the
twentieth and twenty-first century is an accidental quirk stemming from an amalgamation of historical/political contingencies, economic need, and curious exploration. Even as we see unprecedented new connections being forged, a new vocabulary to make the transdisciplinary possible is still in the process of being built. Maybe it is not what we believe in or see as possible that matters, but rather, where the subject of our exploration can lead us to contemplate connections we might not even think would be possible. Not everyone has the same vision of this beast called quantum mechanics, but there is a place for everyone to see where they could fit into, even for the more quirkier ones.
Creativity also comes from doing something outside the norm - breaking the boundaries of your comfort. I tried that literally by doing border-crossing on a whim (not entirely true, as I did a pseudo test run the day before) and doing activities on the other side that were both planned and unplanned. The last time I had done state-level border-crossing on an almost daily basis was back in the summer of 2010; it was memorable to this day. In the act of crossing state line, I came in direct contact with further inspirations that did not precede from having experienced a life-changing moment, but from associating the phenomena of the experience with already present nascent ideas seguing in and out of consciousness without an anchor that merely needed an excuse (or tangible entity) to ground them. That is the experience of being an art-science/science-art practitioner.
To end this post, I leave a link to an interview with the artistic director of the Centre for Fine Arts (BOZAR) on the importance of arts, science, and technological interdisciplinarity.
Comments
Post a Comment